Science disconfirms, pseudoscience confirms

This is a bit technical (both the deviation and the text below) continue at your own risk! Something like this is what I wanted to create in my last uploaded deviation, but In the end I realized my experiments failed. Now I tried a different angle and well, I think it is better.

So I was talking with (or is it to?, which proposition should be used here?) someone about female breasts. Although fake breasts are my favourite because of their shape, because the woman has the potential to have full control on their size and because they were obtained by the female at her own will (there are exceptions to this but when that happens the one responsible of the enhancement should pay for their crimes), I like natural breasts as well, as long as they are round enough (the faker the look the better!).

Natural breasts are quite complex structures (it is amazing mammaries evolved from sweat glands), but the basic anatomy should be known by everyone visiting my gallery, as I expect everyone showing their nose here to have been thru highschool at the very least. Most of the breast tissue volume tends to be either adipose (fatty) or glandular (parenchyma) tissue. I find that mostly glandular breasts are sexier and more feminine than adipose ones, however the amount of glandular tissue apparently has little influence in the amount of milk a woman can produce (I am a big skeptic about that statement, after all the cow races with bigger udders make more milk than those with more modest sizes).

Why do glandular breasts appeal me more than fatty ones? Well fatty breasts are not really that special if you think about it, after all even slightly obese guys may develop saggy ones (saggy fatty breasts are not exactly what I'd call feminine, but well, we are all free to have different tastes). Really obese males could have moobs larger than many female's real boobs. Fatty breasts tend fluctuate with their owner's weight. Adipose breasts tend to sag more than glandular breasts, considering the relative amount of protein in the tissue is lower than in the glandular. As a woman gets older, more of her breast tissue gets replaced by fat and that favours further sag.

Glandular breasts, unlike fatty ones, are a female specialty (with some rare exceptions, I guess). An experienced plastic surgeon can estimate whether a breast contains significant fat, but mammography is more accurate.  The mammography images give a picture of the relative fatty and glandular tissues, and are graded by the radiologist on the BI-RADS system, where a BI-RADS 1 means that your breast is over 75% fat, and a BI-RADS 4 breast is over 75% gland (BI-RADS 2 means breasts are 50-75% fat, BI-RADS 3 means they are 50-75% glands).

In the diagram above, a fictional female character is depicted as having a BI-RADS score of over 9000!!!!!. Hah! No, but really the character has supremely developed mammary glands, with no room for fat (maybe there's some connective tissue near the nipples tho). Basically all what you would see inside her breasts are innumerable lactiferous lobules. And each one of these lobules is bigger than  the biggest breasts known in real life!

According to her creator, the character's breasts are growing with such impetus that: 1- her skin can just barely keep up, that's why it stays shiny and taut; 2- her breasts are super perky due both to the tautness of the skin and to how tightly the glands are packed; 3-The growth is so aggressive that some glands just burst under the intense pressure, the nutrients released are reabsorbed to grow even more gland; 4-Although the character loves being such monstrously mammary, the enormous energetic demands of the continuous very growth of her assets, seems to have stunted the growth of her body when she was younger, and, now as much as then, have some sort of debilitating effect on her. Poor cute thing!

This character belongs to Mars is mine.